Some thoughts on revision

It is still summer here, but this week marks a turning; the mornings have been cool, and at the end of a warm day I needed a sweater for an after-dinner walk. The pears on the backyard tree are suddenly pendulous, and the lettuces I never got around to using have bolted. Every day I told myself that I must pick the cherry tomatoes that are beginning to rot on the vine, but I didn’t get to them until Saturday. My interest in the garden is waning as much as the season.

It was our last week before Cane and I return to school, and our focus has turned inward. We spent much of the week on painting a back room, and all the doors in our hallway. (There are 7! A ridiculous number for an 1,100 sq. ft. house, but ours is the clown car of houses; it also has 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, and a full laundry room.) We also finished working on our renovation of the front of the house–or, at least, finished working on it for this year.

When I look at the house’s listing photos from 2018 and then those I’ve taken today, I am struck by the power of vision and revision.

It is the same house, and it is not.

Our changes were driven by function: I wanted more light in the house. The first year I thinned and cut back the camellias. I wanted more light, but I also liked the privacy screen they provided, so I didn’t cut too much. I planted some things around the camellias to fill in the space that felt too empty after making them smaller.

During our first pandemic spring, as the weather warmed, we found ourselves sitting on the front steps at the end of the day with a cold beverage. We talked about how it would be nice if the porch were large enough to hold some chairs, as sitting on the hard steps with only a post at our backs for support wasn’t very comfortable. We found that we liked sitting there and seeing all the people who walk by, and listening to the boys one door down shoot baskets in the street. Having a privacy screen began to feel less important than having a greater connection to the world. We cut the camellias way back, and I used a good chunk of my stimulus check to buy even more plants to fill in the spaces below them. We began talking about extending the porch, but I wanted the camellias to stay.

That spring and summer, we walked all over our city. Walking was one of the few things we could do for entertainment outside the house. We’d drive to different neighborhoods and walk their streets, talking about the houses we’d see, analyzing what made them appealing (or not). I started taking photos of houses with features I thought I’d like to have in mine.

We noticed that we liked a low porch with ranch homes; they felt inviting. We liked thicker post beams and window boxes and wood doors.

I decided I’d rather have a low deck than the camellias. Near the end of the summer I got brave and told Cane I was ready to take them all the way out, something he’d been advocating for a while, but when we did I wondered if I’d made a mistake. Did I cut out too much? The front of the house felt empty, and maybe too exposed. And there still wasn’t as much light inside the house as I’d hoped there would be. I had wanted camellias in my yard for a long time–the presence of them had been a selling point when I was making the decision to buy the house–and I’d gone and destroyed them. There was no putting those mature trees back once they were gone. It wasn’t like cutting bangs, you know?
I had to live with it for awhile like that (a whole year, as it turned out) before feeling comfortable with it and knowing what to do next.

These thoughts of revision and revision processes have been much on my mind this week, as I start preparing to return to classroom teaching for the first time in twelve (12!!!) years.

To put things in some perspective: My students were four years old the last time I was a classroom teacher. They’ve never really known a world without smartphones. I left the classroom the same year I started a Facebook account. There was no Instagram, Pinterest, Snapchat, or Tiktok around the last time I was an English teacher. Obama had just begun the first year of his first term and many were celebrating our wonderful post-racial world. (Hah!)

Waking up with a headache one morning this week and wanting to keep my eyes away from screens, I wandered to my bookcase and pulled out William Stafford’s You Must Revise Your Life. It had been years since I’d looked at it. Stafford grew up in the midwest but is legend in my part of the world, and I earned my M.A.T. at the school he made his academic home (Lewis and Clark College). His ideas about teaching, writing, and learning were seminal in my development as both a writer and teacher, and seeing the passages I’d marked decades ago felt a little like time traveling:

At first I taught as those around me did–correcting papers, pushing students to ‘succeed.’ But gradually my ways changed. A teacher just retiring at San Jose State had told me that teaching composition got harder and harder. She was writing more on a student’s paper that the student had written. She was heroic. But I thought mistakenly so.

My classes became more like ballet than like workshops. What did a piece of writing mean?–not what did it say, but what did it portend, or hint, or reveal, about that surely valid human impulse that brought it about? My job was not to correct but to understand and participate. A student’s paper was a test for me, and I began not to put any evaluation remarks at all on a paper. My remarks were meant to show my accompaniment, sometimes my readiness to learn more.

(You Must Revise Your Life, ©1986, page 17-18 of the The University of Michigan Press’s 2006 edition)

When I began teaching, there was a paradigmatic war raging in English departments between traditionalists and those who believed in the kind of teaching Stafford espoused. I was wounded in more than one skirmish in my first years of teaching. From my (admittedly limited) vantage point, I’d say that the movement toward standards and accountability ushered in by 2001’s No Child Left Behind legislation gave the win to the traditionalists and killed Stafford’s kind of pedagogy.

When I read, “The student should not worry about standards. I won’t. And I will never try to make the student either complacent or panicked about external obligation. Never. That kind of measuring is not what art, what writing, is about,” I sighed (page 94). Equating writing with art ignores the writing that is done not to create art but to gain admittance through gates; that’s a kind of ignoring I once did but now can’t do. I’ve come to understand the privilege inherent in such a position, and the disservice I might do by not being explicit with students about what they need to be able to do to pass through barriers to schools, scholarships, and jobs. But I sighed also because in the schools I’ve known, writing has become a thing so broken down into its concrete, measurable parts that we’ve lost sight of the whole; we’ve turned process into something nearly void of space for discovery or wonder–something essential to all kinds of writing, even the gate-keeping kind. I might argue that the same has been true of how we view and work with students. There was a lot of talk of “the whole student” in my early years of teaching, but that’s not terminology I’ve heard for years. I suppose we are turning back to that now, with understanding borne of the pandemic and our recent emphasis on social and emotional learning, but our high school students have spent their entire eduction in a system driven by data, test scores, and the attainment of discrete skills and bites of knowledge. The reasons for this are myriad and complex and not really germane to my main point, which is that the students I will be meeting in a little more than a week are going to be different in important ways from those I once taught, as will the context in which I’ll be teaching.

And that’s OK. I am different, too. I need to revise my practice as I have been revising my life.

As I prepare to return to something I once thought I’d left forever, I’m thinking a lot about the project we’ve been engaged in of revising our house. I look at those earlier photos of our home and see what a closed, uninviting place it was. I think of my worries about being seen as I went about the business of living within its walls, and how I was afraid to lose the camellia’s screen. I think about how I was afraid to get rid of the camellia because it was a thing I had once wanted, even though it was keeping me from other things I now value more. I think about how I was initially uncomfortable with the openness I now treasure.

I have been wondering what, like the camellia, I may have to cut out of my ways of teaching–wrong and risky as it may feel to do so. I have been wondering how I can create a classroom with an open porch, with doors that are more window than wood. I have been thinking about how Stafford is not unlike a vintage home: Clearly of and for a different era, with both features that no longer work and those worthy of preservation.

As I think about all our students have been living through in recent years–our divided and divisive politics, our climate crisis, the pandemic–it seems to me that it’s time for the pendulum to begin its arc back to a way of teaching that is more holistic. More flexible, responsive, and humane. Near the end of the book, in an interview piece called “Facing Up to the Job,” Stafford talks about visiting high schools with limited and restrictive libraries and nothing on the walls but military recruitment posters. He says:

…I’m not trying to indict anyone, but I suddenly felt forlorn. I thought those who talk about accountability in schools think they’re talking about split infinitives or something–trivialities. I’m talking about lives, vision, hope, something plain like kindness and humility, and they’d throw their kids into a school that would teach them all about split infinitives and send them straight over to drop bombs on someone. Is that accountability?

“Facing Up to the Job,” page 86.

As I watch my city struggle with soaring hospitalizations, houselessness, and crime, I’m thinking hard about what accountability really means, and I appreciate Stafford for helping me to think about it. Seems to me the world could do with a whole lot more vision, hope, kindness and humility right now.

(From an after-dinner walk at dusk last night. We’re eating out only at places with outdoor dining again. It was pretty wonderful to sit at a picnic table outside a dive bar and eat some really good fried chicken as the sun made its descent on the day, the season. Will miss this kind of evening when the weather turns.)

8 thoughts on “Some thoughts on revision

  1. TD says:

    Hello Rita. Will you be working at the same school as Cain?

    I like all three versions of your home. Is the front facing North?

    I love how you tied all of this writing together!

  2. TD says:

    Hello Rita. Will you be working at the same school as Cain?

    I like all three versions of your home. Is the front facing North?

    I love how you tied all of this writing together!

    • Rita says:

      Hi TD–
      Yes, we’ll be teaching at the same school. We did that many years ago–it’s where we met.

      The front of the house is facing west, which is really nice. That side of the house gets really nice afternoon sun.

      Thank you for the kind words, and I hope you’re doing well.

      • TD says:

        Well that is great news that you both will be working at the same school and that is where you met your future husband to be is sweet as coconut pie, Rita!

        West facing front out door seating area is really nice for the sun and moon sets and enjoying the evening neighbors. That looks like it might be your living room corner window. My kitchen corner window over my sink is the opposite of yours. I watch the evening sunset and moon sets from my corner window.

        My open large Saltillo tile patio is in the back yard with an 8’ privacy fence all the way around. I too took down the metal covering that was just an oven backing sauna to open up the space to allow light inside the cottage and to be able to see the Texas size sky and starlights.I absolutely love it!

        Sounds like your back decking might be east facing. My east facing is the front. First item on my action list was hiring a man to remove all the over grown bush landscape that completely enclosed the beautifully covered Saultio tile front porch. The living room with three large window panes and door opens to a seating area. And removed all the landscaping covering up the other two large windows on each side of the porch. There’s the same saultio sealed tile sidewalks to the driveway and to the street with two gorgeous old live oak trees in front and have had them trimmed three times as wonderful umbrellas. Instead of all that work to maintain bushes, I used the recycled plastic red mulch. I opened it all up because I love sitting out in the front watching and chatting with neighbors! My south side neighbor did not like my actions (actually she really just doesn’t understand why I love the openness).

        I changed the exterior color from depressing bland gray with colonial white trim to a cheerful golden with honey white trim and painted the front door farm fresh green instead of white. All of that activity was the first 4 months. It was a drastic change for some neighbors who have resided on this street 60-80 years. Some neighbors have stopped by to say that the love what all I’ve done. The “revisions” reflect my personality and my goal for simplicity with zero to low maintenance.

        I suppose you may be considering a purgula in the future like the photo of ideas…

        I hope that you will like your new job. It certainly will be a new direction for you. I looking forward to hearing more in the times ahead.

        And yes, I’m feeling better (relief and less stress and finished my financial system, tweaking as I see fit) these recent days.

    • Rita says:

      We’ve had quite a few days in the 70s, and it has been so so nice. The 70s are my sweet spot for sunny weather. Soaking it ALL up.

  3. Kate says:

    You have such a gift with metaphors. I started writing a comment on my phone yesterday while I was waiting for someone in a car and then they were done and I got sidetracked so I hope I can sum up what I was thinking about opportunity cost and both/and and balance. V and I have talked recently about learning certain grammar rules so that our writing can be more clear, but then also when we know them we can choose to break them as a stylistic choice (versus not taking the time to learn them in the first place). I like the idea of a teacher allowing students to have their voice, to try and understand, to engage on that level. I also love learning how to diagram sentences and wish we still taught that (but I’m pretty left-brained by nature). I love the camellias. I love the openness of the porch. I know some times we have to choose one over the other, but isn’t it nice when we get to make a choice from two good things? I think that can be nerve wracking, especially when talking about something almost-permanent like full grown bushes, despite knowing that both options are okay. I don’t know. I just finished reading Midnight Library. I’m all in my head about parallel universes and alternative lives we could live.

    I hope you have a fabulous school year and that you find the balance between structure and creativity. I haven’t a doubt that you will (and like/unlike the porch, you can putter and tweak until you find your balance.) I

    • Rita says:

      Thank you for taking the time to recreate your thoughts. I always appreciate them. I try hard not to spend much time thinking about alternate lives and parallel universes. I think one of my biggest frustrations with life is that I’ll never get to live all the ones I might have enjoyed. It’s a nice problem to have, isn’t it? Choosing between multiple good things.

      I am in agreement with you on the importance of learning fundamentals. About anything, but especially writing. That said, I never diagrammed sentences. I did a bit in a linguistics class once, but that was a different kind of diagramming. I did not really learn the rules of grammar/conventions until I became an editor after getting my undergrad degree. I learned them then only because I had a real need to. That’s a thing I think about often when trying to decide what’s important to teach.

      I hope you and V have a great school year, too. That feels like a lofty wish, considering all that we are still contending with, but I wish it all the same.

Leave a Reply to Rita Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

CommentLuv badge

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.